Case 2411686/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Shannon v Griffin Nursery Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2411686/2023
- Decision date
- 12 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Shannon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the case under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages for July and August 2023 and ordered payment of the net sum of £1,567.28.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the respondent to pay damages in the gross sum of £633.60, with the claimant being responsible for any tax liabilities arising from the gross figure if tax was not deducted at source.
In total, the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £2,200.88. The judgment was issued by Employment Judge Phil Allen, dated 29 May 2024 and sent to the parties on 12 June 2024.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from the claimant's July and August 2023 wages; net sum ordered. | Upheld | — | £1,567 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages ordered in gross sum. Claimant responsible for any tax liabilities arising from the gross award. | Upheld | — | £634 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,201
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.