Case 2411689/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Stringer-Prince v Morrells Woodfinishers Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 2411689/2018
- Decision date
- 29 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Feeney REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Stringer-Prince
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr D Stringer-Prince's claim of unfair dismissal succeeded against Morrells Woodfinishers Ltd. The judgment record states that the decision was given orally at the hearing and does not include written reasons, so the file contains the outcome and award but not a detailed written explanation of the tribunal's reasoning.
The award was split into a basic award of £700, calculated as 2 x £350 gross weekly wage, and a compensatory award of £498, calculated as 2 x £248 net weekly wage. The total award ordered was £1,198.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The award was set out as a basic award of £700 and a compensatory award of £498, making a total of £1,198. | Upheld | — | £1,198 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,198
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £700
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £498
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.