Case 2411722/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Toni Allcock v The Medika Clinic Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2411722/2023
- Decision date
- 10 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Toni Allcock
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Judge determined the claim under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. The respondent was named as The Medika Clinic Limited. The judgment records that the claimant was Miss T Allcock and that the case proceeded on the papers.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages by failing to pay her £3,654.80. It ordered the respondent to pay that gross sum to the claimant, with the claimant to account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due. The judgment does not allocate any separate award for interest as part of the tribunal's order.
The tribunal noted that the claimant had sought interest, but said it could not make such an award up to judgment and that interest on the judgment debt was addressed elsewhere. The listed hearing on 23 August 2024 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal acted under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £3,655 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,655
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.