Case 2411759/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Walker v Whitehaven Rugby League Football Club — 2024
- Case reference
- 2411759/2023
- Decision date
- 27 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Walker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Phil Allen amended the respondent's name to Whitehaven Rugby League Football Club (2010) Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages for July, August, September and October 2023.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £2,848. The figure was expressed as £712 net pay per month for four months. No separate split between categories of loss was recorded in the judgment.
The hearing listed for 24 June 2024 was cancelled. The written record also included the standard tribunal notice about interest, but no separate interest amount was stated in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for July, August, September and October 2023 and ordered payment of the net sum of £2,848, calculated at £712 net pay per month for four months. | Upheld | — | £2,848 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,848
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.