Case 2411770/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Leicester v Regency Domestics Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2411770/2018
- Decision date
- 7 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Leicester
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Ross found that Ms L Leicester had been dismissed by reason of redundancy by Regency Domestics Limited. On that basis, the tribunal held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment.
The amount awarded for the redundancy payment was £7,312.50. The judgment does not split the award into separate components beyond that figure, and it does not record any additional remedy for the redundancy claim.
The judgment also states that the claimant’s notice pay claim would proceed to a hearing, where the tribunal would consider whether that claim had been presented in time. That issue was not determined in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £7,312.50. The separate notice pay claim was not finally determined in this judgment and was listed to proceed to hearing on timeliness. | Upheld | — | £7,313 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,313
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.