Case 2411804/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Hurst v AAO UK Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2411804/2023
- Decision date
- 3 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Hurst
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was made under Rule 21 in chambers, with neither party in attendance. The tribunal found that the claimant's claims for three weeks' unpaid wages, one week's notice pay, and nine days' accrued but untaken holiday on termination were well-founded. It ordered the respondent to pay £2,019.25 gross for unpaid wages, £673.08 gross for notice pay, and £1,211.53 gross for holiday pay, giving a stated total of £3,903.86 payable within 14 days.
The tribunal also found the claimant's complaints under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 well-founded, on the basis of a failure to comply with the requirements of section 188. It ordered a protective award for the claimant, who was dismissed for redundancy between 14 and 30 September 2023, equivalent to remuneration for 30 days beginning on 30 September 2023. The Recoupment Regulations apply to that protective award.
The interest notice states that interest would become payable only if the monetary award remained unpaid more than 14 days after the judgment was sent to the parties, with interest accruing from 4 June 2024 at 8% per annum. No specific interest sum was awarded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal described this as a claim for unpaid wages for three weeks and ordered payment of £2,019.25 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,019 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal described this as a claim for notice pay for one week and ordered payment of £673.08 gross. | Upheld | — | £673 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal described this as a claim for nine days' accrued but untaken holiday on termination and ordered payment of £1,211.53 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,212 |
| Other | The tribunal upheld complaints under section 189 of TULRCA 1992 of failure to comply with section 188 and made a protective award equivalent to 30 days' remuneration. The judgment did not state a quantified sum for this award. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,904
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 - Rule 21
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.