Case 2411824/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A McGregor v Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust — 2019
- Case reference
- 2411824/2018
- Decision date
- 8 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Whittaker
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A McGregor
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Whittaker, sitting alone at Manchester on 18 March 2019, recorded judgment in the claim brought by Ms A McGregor against Tameside & Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust. The judgment states that the claimant's claim for unfair (constructive) dismissal was struck out.
The reason recorded for the strike-out was that the claim had been presented out of time contrary to section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records no separate adjudication of a disability discrimination complaint and no monetary remedy or award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes the claim as one for unfair (constructive) dismissal and records that it was struck out as presented out of time contrary to section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.