Case 2411832/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Wright v Advent Construction (North West) Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2411832/2023
- Decision date
- 26 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Wright
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the net sum of £4,863.64.
The award was calculated as the sum of an underpayment of wages from August 2023 of £1,556.32 and an underpayment of wages from September 2023 of £3,307.32. The hearing previously listed for 12 July 2024 was cancelled. A notice was attached regarding interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, with the relevant decision day recorded as 26 June 2024 and the stipulated rate of interest at 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. Net sum comprises underpayment of wages from August 2023 (£1,556.32) and September 2023 (£3,307.32). | Upheld | — | £4,864 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,864
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.