Case 2411902/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Biggs v Cheshire Sports Coaching Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2411902/2023
- Decision date
- 20 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Biggs
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found that Mr W Biggs was dismissed by reason of redundancy and that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,403.50 against Cheshire Sports Coaching Limited.
The written judgment also records that the claimant's other claims would proceed to hearing on 12 July 2014. No further findings on those claims are contained in the extracted text, and the notice on interest simply states the relevant decision day as 20 February 2024, the calculation day as 21 February 2024, and the stipulated interest rate as 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,403.50. The judgment also says the claimant's other claims would proceed to hearing on 12 July 2014, which appears inconsistent with the 2024 decision date and is recorded as written. | Upheld | — | £1,404 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,404
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.