Case 2411912/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Bailey v Hero Group Holdings Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2411912/2023
- Decision date
- 12 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Bailey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment in Miss L Bailey v Hero Group Holdings Ltd records a strike out only and does not decide the substance of any underlying complaint. The tribunal noted that, by a letter dated 29 September 2024, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment is a short procedural decision and does not contain findings on liability, remedy, or the merits of any substantive claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying heads of claim; it records only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.