Case 2411917/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Refson-Keane v Keep Left Ltd (in Liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 2411917/2018
- Decision date
- 22 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Refson-Keane
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn reconsideration, the tribunal varied the respondent's name to Keep Left Ltd (in Liquidation) because the original judgment had been made against an individual rather than the limited company that employed the claimant. The judgment replaced the earlier version sent to the parties on 22 August 2019.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £782.00 gross. That sum was made up of £442.00 for 7 to 21 March 2018 and £340.00 for 9, 11, 16 and 18 May 2018.
The tribunal also upheld the claim for unpaid holiday entitlement and ordered £268.00 gross for accrued holiday for the period 1 March to 18 May 2018. In addition, pursuant to section 27(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, it ordered £70.00 compensation for bank overdraft charges incurred, bringing the total financial award to £1,120.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £782.00, comprising £442.00 for 7 to 21 March 2018 and £340.00 for 9, 11, 16 and 18 May 2018. The judgment also ordered £70.00 compensation for bank overdraft charges under section 27(3) ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £782 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £268.00 gross for accrued entitlement for the period 1 March to 18 May 2018. | Upheld | — | £268 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,120
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £70
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.27(3) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.