Case 2411945/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Twist v Chantal Broadhurst and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2411945/2023
- Decision date
- 31 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Childe Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr C Twist
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the case under Rule 21 and found that the respondents had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,200.00 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found the breach of contract claim in relation to notice pay to be well-founded. It awarded the claimant one week's statutory notice pay as damages for breach of contract, assessed at £507.69 gross.
The unfair dismissal complaint was not awarded. The judgment states that, on the claim form, the claimant did not have the necessary two years' qualifying service. The claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why that claim could proceed, but no response was received, so the unfair dismissal claim was struck out.
No award was made for holiday pay because the claimant withdrew that claim on 17 April 2024. The total payable under the judgment was £2,707.69, and the listed hearing for 17 April 2025 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,200.00. | Upheld | — | £2,200 |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim concerned notice pay. The tribunal found it well-founded and awarded one week's statutory notice pay as damages in the gross sum of £507.69. | Upheld | — | £508 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that no award was made for unfair dismissal because the claim form stated the claimant did not have two years' qualifying service. The claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing but did not respond, and the claim was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal recorded that no award was made for holiday pay because the claimant withdrew that claim on 17 April 2024. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,708
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.