Case 2411961/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 2411961/2018
- Decision date
- 21 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Mr M Gelling, Dr B Tirohl
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Manchester on 5 September 2019, Employment Judge Holmes sat with Mr M Gelling and Dr B Tirohl. After hearing counsel for the claimant and solicitor for the respondent, and by consent, the tribunal ordered that the claims in case nos 2411961/2018 and 2413281/2018 be dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment records no substantive liability findings and no remedy assessment. It therefore contains no award and no legal reasoning on the underlying breach of contract, public interest disclosure, or unfair dismissal issues beyond the procedural disposal on withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim type taken from the case context listing categories supplied with the judgment. The judgment itself records only that the claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Claim type taken from the case context listing categories supplied with the judgment. The judgment itself records only that the claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim type taken from the case context listing categories supplied with the judgment. The judgment itself records only that the claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.