Case 2411961/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Umar v Community Care Direct Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2411961/2023
- Decision date
- 28 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspinall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Umar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was the third attempt at a final hearing in Miss E Umar’s claim against Community Care Direct Limited. Employment Judge Aspinall sat alone at Liverpool on 13 February 2025. The only listed complaint was unauthorised deduction from wages.
The tribunal recorded a history of non-compliance with case management orders and said that an Unless Order had been made requiring the claimant to send the respondent a written witness statement by 12 noon on 12 February 2025. The claimant did not comply with that order.
As a result, the tribunal struck out the claimant’s complaint. No monetary remedy was awarded and no further substantive findings on the underlying wages claim were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant’s complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was struck out after she failed to comply with an Unless Order requiring her to send a written witness statement to the respondent by 12 noon on 12 February 2025. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.