Case 2411963/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Bond v AGR Contracts Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2411963/2023
- Decision date
- 18 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Serr REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Bond
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester by CVP on 11 July 2024 before Employment Judge Serr. The tribunal dealt only with Mr P Bond's holiday pay complaint against AGR Contracts Ltd, and it gave reasons orally at the hearing rather than in a written reasons judgment.
The tribunal found the holiday pay complaint well-founded. It held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages by failing to pay him for holidays that had accrued but had not been taken by the date his employment ended.
As a result, the respondent was ordered to pay Mr Bond £564. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance on that sum. The accompanying notice records that interest would only become relevant if the award remained unpaid after the relevant decision day.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal described this as a complaint in respect of holiday pay and held that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when employment ended. | Upheld | — | £564 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £564
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.