Case 2411967/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Currie v Pro-Tect UK Security & Training Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2411967/2023
- Decision date
- 23 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Currie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal considered Mr L Currie's claim against Pro-Tect UK Security & Training Ltd and struck it out. The reason given was that the claim had not been actively pursued.
By a letter dated 31 January 2024, the Tribunal invited the claimant to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the Tribunal ordered that the claim be struck out. No remedy was awarded or assessed in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. By letter dated 31 January 2024, the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing, but he failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.