Case 2412085/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Kearns v Diverse Active Living Day Service RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2025
- Case reference
- 2412085/2023
- Decision date
- 16 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Kearns
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy consent of the parties, the Tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. It recorded that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the period from 27 July to 3 August 2023.
The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £350, described as the net sum deducted, with the respondent responsible for any tax or National Insurance. The claims for holiday pay and automatic unfair dismissal were dismissed on withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded by consent. | Upheld | — | £350 |
| Holiday pay | The claim for holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The claim for automatic unfair dismissal was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £350
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.