Case 2412092/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Nwosu v L J Health and Wellbeing Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2412092/2023
- Decision date
- 10 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspinall Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Nwosu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked as a care support worker for the respondent limited company for around three months in summer 2023, at hourly rates of £10.50 (weekdays) and £11.20 (weekends). He completed timesheets signed by senior nurses for five shifts worked between 22 August and 1 September 2023, but was not paid for those shifts despite pursuing the respondent and being assured by the director, Mr Liam Jackson, that payment would follow once timesheets were sent.
The respondent failed to submit a response in time, filed a late response without an application to extend time, and did not attend the hearing. The Employment Judge rejected the late response under Rule 18 and proceeded in the respondent's absence, finding it in the interests of justice to do so given the claim was quantifiable from documentary and oral evidence. Applying section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Tribunal found wages of £444.85 were properly payable and ordered the respondent to pay that sum.
The unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed on withdrawal because the claimant did not have the requisite two years' service. The respondent's title was amended to LJ Health and Well-being Limited, and the judgment was directed to be sent to both the claim form address and the company's registered office.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found wages properly payable for five shifts in August/September 2023 totalling £444.85, evidenced by three timesheets signed by senior nurses and oral evidence from the claimant. | Upheld | — | £445 |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on withdrawal because the claimant did not have two years' service. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £445
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Rule 18 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 2 overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.