Case 2412132/2023 · Employment Tribunal

Mr P Gregory v NP Integrated Technology Ltd — 2024

Case reference: 2412132/2023
Decision date: 22 July 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge M Butler Representation
Venue: Manchester

Indexed: 17 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr P Gregory

Respondent

NP Integrated Technology Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The claimant, Mr P Gregory, worked for NP Integrated Technology Ltd for 38 days between 24 July 2023 and 31 August 2023 on a gross salary of £28,000 (equivalent to £538.46 per week, £107.69 per day and £11.97 per hour based on a 45-hour week). The respondent did not attend the hearing, which took place by CVP before Employment Judge M Butler on 5 July 2024. The tribunal found that the claimant had taken no holiday during his employment and had accrued 2.92 days, giving rise to a holiday pay entitlement of £301.54 gross.

The tribunal also found that the claimant was owed pay for 26 hours of overtime at the contractual overtime rate of 125% of his hourly pay, producing a further £389.03 gross. Judgment was entered in the claimant's favour for the combined gross sum of £690.57 for unauthorised deductions from his wages.

The respondent was additionally found to have failed to provide the claimant with a written statement of particulars and was ordered to pay 2 weeks' pay (£1,076.92). The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant a total sum of £1,767.49.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Holiday pay	Tribunal found the claimant had accrued 2.92 days of holiday over 38 days of employment and was owed £301.54 gross (2.92 x £107.69).	Upheld	—	£302
Unlawful deduction from wages	Tribunal found 26 hours of overtime unpaid at 125% of £11.97 hourly rate, totalling £389.03 gross. Combined with holiday pay this forms the £690.57 figure entered for unauthorised deductions from wages.	Upheld	—	£389
Other	Failure to provide a written statement of particulars; respondent ordered to pay 2 weeks' pay at £538.46 per week (£1,076.92). The §4.4 enum has no dedicated category for this s.38 Employment Act 2002 award, so classified as 'other'.	Upheld	—	£1,077

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £1,767; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.