Case 2412169/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Archie Pownall v Alliance Norse Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2412169/2023
- Decision date
- 19 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspinall Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Archie Pownall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Liverpool on 15 July 2024 before Employment Judge Aspinall. The claimant, Archie Pownall, did not attend, and the respondent, Alliance Norse Limited, was represented by Mr Ashley, Counsel.
The tribunal's judgment records that the claimant's claim was dismissed in its entirety on non-appearance under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No findings were made on the underlying merits of any pleaded complaint.
The written record does not set out separate determinations for the listed discrimination and unfair dismissal issues, and it does not contain any remedy award. The note to the judgment states that reasons were given orally and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment does not separate individual pleaded claims. It records that the claimant's claim was dismissed in its entirety because the claimant did not attend, under Rule 47. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The written judgment does not separate individual pleaded claims. It records that the claimant's claim was dismissed in its entirety because the claimant did not attend, under Rule 47. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment does not separate individual pleaded claims. It records that the claimant's claim was dismissed in its entirety because the claimant did not attend, under Rule 47. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.