Case 2412221/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Green v S & D Hospitality Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2412221/2023
- Decision date
- 19 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lloyd
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Green
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim in its entirety. The reason given was that the claimant had not complied with the orders of Employment Judge Lloyd issued at a case management hearing on 12 August 2024, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
By letter dated 30 January 2025, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, explaining why the claim should not be struck out on those grounds. The reasons record that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make any sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
As a result, Employment Judge Cookson recorded that the claim was struck out in its entirety. The judgment does not determine any substantive employment claims or record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim categories individually; it states that the claim in its entirety was struck out because the claimant did not comply with case management orders and had not actively pursued the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.