Case 2412234/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Stott v The Entertainer (Amersham) Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2412234/2023
- Decision date
- 8 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Mr Q Colborn, Mr P Dobson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Stott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the claimant's mental impairment of Generalised Anxiety Disorder was not a disability for the purposes of s.6 of the Equality Act 2010. The claims for discrimination arising from disability and failure to make reasonable adjustments were therefore dismissed.
The Tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and wrongfully dismissed. The compensatory award for unfair dismissal was limited to 9 weeks, and any unfair dismissal award was reduced by 75% for contributory fault.
Following the liability decision, the parties agreed a figure of £1,000 in respect of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal. The judgment states that the Recoupment Regulations did not apply because the parties settled the claim following the liability decision.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant's Generalised Anxiety Disorder was found not to be a disability under s.6 Equality Act 2010 and that the allegation of discrimination arising from disability was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the allegation that the respondent failed in its duty to make reasonable adjustments was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, that the compensatory award was limited to 9 weeks, and that any unfair dismissal award was reduced by 75% for contributory fault. The agreed award was not split between unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was wrongfully dismissed. The agreed award was not split between unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,000
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.