Case 2412882/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Barlow v Sports & Leisure Group NV — 2024
- Case reference
- 2412882/2023
- Decision date
- 14 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Barlow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the tribunal recorded that all three complaints succeeded. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages between 1 and 14 August 2023 and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,307.70.
The tribunal also upheld the breach of contract complaint in respect of expenses and ordered payment of £404.50. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £3,023.08.
The judgment states that the hearing listed on 13 August 2024 was cancelled. A separate notice on interest recorded that the relevant decision day was 14 May 2024, the calculation day was 15 May 2024, and the stipulated rate of interest was 8%, but no separate interest figure was set out in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 1 to 14 August 2023 and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,307.70. | Upheld | — | £2,308 |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract complaint concerned expenses and succeeded in the sum of £404.50. | Upheld | — | £405 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £3,023.08. | Upheld | — | £3,023 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,735
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.