Case 2412903/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Tonchev v Proactive Personnel Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2412903/2023
- Decision date
- 12 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Tonchev
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the complaint about underpayment of holiday pay was well-founded. It held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages by failing to pay the correct amount for holidays taken between 8 December 2021 and August 2023.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £55.42, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance. The Tribunal stated that it could not consider any underpayment of holiday pay before 8 December 2021 because of section 23(4A) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the complaint in respect of underpayment of holiday pay was well-founded and that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay the correct holiday pay. The Tribunal could not consider underpayments before 8 December 2021 because of section 23(4A) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £55 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £55
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 23(4A) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.