Case 2412907/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Goldberg v Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 2412907/2023
- Decision date
- 3 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Goldberg
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined whether Mrs R Goldberg was a disabled person for the purposes of s.6 Equality Act 2010 between January 2023 and November 2023. Employment Judge Anderson recorded that during that period the claimant was a disabled person by reason of Osteoarthritis.
The tribunal also recorded that, during the same period, the claimant was not a disabled person for the purposes of s.6 Equality Act 2010 by reason of Perthes disease. The written judgment does not determine liability on any substantive disability discrimination complaint and records no remedy or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records a preliminary determination of disability status under s.6 Equality Act 2010: the claimant was a disabled person by reason of Osteoarthritis between January 2023 and November 2023, but not by reason of Perthes disease. It does not record a liability outcome on any substantive discrimination complaint. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.