Case 2413101/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Ahern v Burys Solicitors Limited HELD AT: Manchester — 2024
- Case reference
- 2413101/2023
- Decision date
- 23 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Childe REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Ahern
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records only the Tribunal's decision on costs. Pursuant to rule 76(1), the claimant was ordered to pay the respondent £8,718 inclusive of VAT.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written record does not set out findings on the underlying breach of contract, unlawful deduction from wages, or Working Time Regulations claims, and does not state the merits outcome of those claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The available judgment is a costs judgment only. The listing category identifies breach of contract, but the merits outcome is not stated in the provided text. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The available judgment is a costs judgment only. The listing category identifies unlawful deduction from wages, but the merits outcome is not stated in the provided text. | Other | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The available judgment is a costs judgment only. The listing category identifies Working Time Regulations, but the merits outcome is not stated in the provided text. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,718
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 76(1)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.