Ms J Musk v LWC Drinks Limited — 2024

Case reference: 2413114/2023
Decision date: 20 September 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms J Musk

Respondent

LWC Drinks Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal heard the case at Manchester by CVP on 28 August 2024 and 18 September 2024 before Employment Judge K M Ross. The claimant was Ms J Musk and the respondent was LWC Drinks Limited. The judgment record states that the claimant was represented by Mr Birbeck and the respondent by Ms Kite, Counsel.

The only substantive claim recorded in the written judgment was unfair dismissal pursuant to sections 95 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal’s decision was that the claim was not well-founded and failed.

The written record notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No remedy was recorded in the written decision, and no monetary award is set out in the text provided.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The written record states only that the unfair dismissal claim under sections 95 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well-founded and failed. No written reasons were provided in the decision text.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.