Case 2413143/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Tuplin v Shop Direct Finance Company Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2413143/2023
- Decision date
- 25 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson
- Panel members
- Ms M Plimley, Mr R Cunningham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms B Tuplin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Liverpool by video on 16 to 19 June 2025 before Employment Judge Benson, Ms M Plimley and Mr R Cunningham. The claimant was Ms B Tuplin and the respondent was Shop Direct Finance Company Limited. The judgment recorded oral reasons given at the hearing and stated that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal dismissed the complaint of unfair dismissal. It also dismissed both disability discrimination complaints: unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability, and failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability. The extract provided records the outcomes only and does not set out detailed findings of fact or a remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.