Case 2413151/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Waterhouse v Reads Court Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2413151/2023
- Decision date
- 26 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Waterhouse
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr M Waterhouse, brought a wages claim against Reads Court Limited. At the Manchester Employment Tribunal hearing on 18 November 2024, Employment Judge M Butler recorded an oral judgment that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant’s wages.
The amount was recorded as agreed at £582.50, and that sum was the award made by the tribunal. The written record also included the standard notice about interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating that interest would be payable if the sum remained unpaid after the relevant decision day, but no separate interest figure was set out in the judgment record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded that the respondent made unlawful deductions from the claimant’s wages in the agreed sum of £582.50. | Upheld | — | £583 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £583
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.