Case 2413174/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. P.R. Turpin v Keeley Travis Business Solutions Ltd. — 2025
- Case reference
- 2413174/2023
- Decision date
- 3 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Mr M. Stemp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. P.R. Turpin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remedy judgment following an earlier liability decision. Sitting at Manchester on 21 October 2025, Judge Callan with Mr M. Stemp issued a unanimous judgment ordering the respondent to pay the claimant £47,254.86. The claimant appeared in person; the respondent was represented by Ms R. Morgan of counsel.
The award was composed of injury to feelings of £16,500, interest on injury to feelings (from 16 October 2023 to date) of £2,661.70, past losses of £22,327 gross, and a 20% ACAS uplift on past losses of £4,465 (giving past losses plus uplift of £26,792 gross / £21,433.60 net). Interest on past losses from the mid-point to date was £1,729.60. A grossing-up figure of £4,929.96 was added in respect of taxation on the £12,324.90 element of the combined injury to feelings and past losses sum of £42,324.90.
The written record sets out the remedy calculations only; reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons were not provided as part of this document. The substantive claim types and findings of fact are not restated in this remedy judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | This is a remedy-only judgment; liability was determined at an earlier hearing. The judgment text identifies the matter via the gov.uk listing under Disability Discrimination but does not itself recite the substantive claim types. Confidence on the underlying claim classification is therefore reduced. | Upheld | Disability | £47,255 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £47,255
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £26,792
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.