Case 2413237/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v AJ Plumbing — 2024
- Case reference
- 2413237/2023
- Decision date
- 11 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Thompson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Thompson, sitting alone, heard Mr I Rehman’s complaint against AJ Plumbing by CVP on 3 September 2024. The tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was well-founded and held that the Respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant’s wages in the period September 2023 to November 2023.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant £1,693.45. It also recorded that the Claimant is responsible for payment of any tax or National Insurance on that sum.
The written record included a standard interest notice stating that if the award is not paid in full within 14 days after the written record was sent to the parties, interest may become payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 at the stipulated rate of 8% per annum from the calculation day.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the Respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages in the period September 2023 to November 2023. | Upheld | — | £1,693 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,693
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.