Case 2413312/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Ashby v Lunar Automotive Limited (in compulsory liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2413312/2020
- Decision date
- 8 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Ashby
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was made under the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, Rules 21 and 60, after the respondent did not present a response to claim number 2413312/2020 and on the basis of admissions in the response to claim number 2419458/2020.
The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions by not paying wages at 80% of normal pay for the period 1 September 2020 to 9 November 2020 and by failing to pay in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement. It also found that the respondent was in breach of contract by not paying the claimant at 100% of normal pay during his three-week notice period.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. Complaints about deducted pension contributions not paid to the pension scheme and underpayment for holiday taken during furlough were left to be decided later and were not determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages for non-payment of wages at 80% of normal pay for 1 September 2020 to 9 November 2020 inclusive. | Upheld | — | £3,008 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract for non-payment at 100% of normal pay during the claimant's three-week notice period. | Upheld | — | £1,128 |
| Redundancy | The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and found entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £1,692 |
| Holiday pay | Unauthorised deduction from wages for failure to pay in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £752 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,579
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Rules 21 and 60
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.