Case 2413327/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Varelis v Mr Steven Anderson — 2021
- Case reference
- 2413327/2020
- Decision date
- 12 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Varelis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr Steven Anderson failed to provide Mr G Varelis with itemised pay statements for the period from 24 January 2020 up to and including the termination of employment on 7 June 2020. The judgment records that this was contrary to section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996 and makes a declaration to that effect.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had made a series of unnotified deductions from the claimant's pay. Under section 12(4) Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £350. The written record does not allocate any separate monetary award to the itemised pay statement complaint.
The judgment is short and contains no broader findings beyond those two matters. It also includes the standard notice on statutory interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, but the only sum ordered in the judgment itself is £350.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim succeeded so far as the tribunal found the respondent failed to provide itemised pay statements for the period 24 January 2020 to 7 June 2020, contrary to section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records a declaration only for this aspect. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found a series of unnotified deductions from the claimant's pay and ordered payment of £350 under section 12(4) Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £350 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £350
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.8 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.12(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.