Case 2413351/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Dr K Giannopoulos v Warrington and Halton Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 2413351/2020
- Decision date
- 20 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr K Giannopoulos
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 10 November 2020, Dr Giannopoulos said his work for the respondent as a locum doctor for the week of 21 to 27 March 2020 was ended after two night shifts, when he was told on 23 March 2020 that he was not required for the rest of the week and that the shifts would be covered by an employee working bank shifts. He brought complaints of unfair dismissal, failure to pay redundancy pay, breach of contract, and direct race discrimination said to arise from treatment because of his Greek nationality.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant accepted he did not have two years' continuous service with the respondent. On that basis, and with the respondent's consent, he withdrew the unfair dismissal and redundancy pay complaints. Those claims were therefore dismissed on withdrawal.
The tribunal found that the claim form was filed one day late. It accepted that the claimant had been working away from home and had practical difficulties, but found he was aware of the time limits and had in fact filed from Wales while away working. Applying the reasonably practicable test and referring to Palmer & Another v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council, the tribunal held it was reasonably practicable to present the breach of contract claim in time, so that complaint was dismissed as out of time.
For the direct race discrimination complaint, the tribunal applied the broader just and equitable time-limit test under s.207B(3) ERA 1996. It accepted there was no practical prejudice to the respondent from the one-day delay and that refusing to extend time would prevent the claimant from pursuing the claim at all. The tribunal therefore allowed the race discrimination claim to proceed to a final hearing rather than determining the merits at that stage.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant accepted he did not have two years' continuous service and withdrew the unfair dismissal complaint; the tribunal dismissed it on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The claimant accepted he did not have two years' continuous service and withdrew the redundancy payment complaint; the tribunal dismissed it on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed because the claim form was received one day out of time and the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have filed it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal did not determine the merits. It allowed the direct race discrimination claim to proceed out of time on the just and equitable basis. | Other | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.207B(3) ERA 1996
- reasonably practicable test
- just and equitable test
- Palmer & Another v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council [1984] ICR 372
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.