Case 2413363/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Winters v Fuse Assurance Solutions Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2413363/2018
- Decision date
- 17 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Winters
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester on 21 August 2019 before Employment Judge Franey, sitting alone. The claimant, Mr J Winters, appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal amended the respondent’s name to Fuse Assurance Solutions Limited to reflect its proper corporate title.
The tribunal found that the respondent made an unlawful deduction from the claimant’s wages in May 2018. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £894.00, being the amount unlawfully deducted from his pay. No separate compensatory or other award was recorded in the judgment.
The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided unless requested. The accompanying interest notice states the tribunal’s standard interest provisions for unpaid sums, but the judgment itself does not quantify any separate interest award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £894 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £894
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.