Case 2413412/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Marcu v Wadsworth Care Homes Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2413412/2020
- Decision date
- 19 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Marcu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Batten recorded three monetary findings in favour of Ms M Marcu against Wadsworth Care Homes Limited. The tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £2,152.00.
The tribunal also found a breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the respondent to pay damages in the net sum of £2,564.40. In a separate finding, the tribunal held that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement due at the termination of employment and ordered payment of the net sum of £690.54.
The total of the three awards is £5,406.94. The judgment also includes the standard notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating the relevant judgment day as 19 January 2021 and the stipulated rate of interest as 8%, but it does not set out any separate interest calculation in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £2,152.00. | Upheld | — | £2,152 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages in the net sum of £2,564.40. | Upheld | — | £2,564 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement due at termination and ordered payment of the net sum of £690.54. | Upheld | — | £691 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,407
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.