Case 2413414/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K O’Callaghan v Mersey Docks and Harbour Company Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2413414/2020
- Decision date
- 28 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K O’Callaghan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Liverpool on 2 and 3 September 2021, before Employment Judge Horne, the tribunal upheld the claimant's breach of contract claim and unfair dismissal claim against Mersey Docks and Harbour Company Limited. It found that the respondent breached the claimant's contract of employment by failing to give notice of termination, and that the claimant was unfairly dismissed.
For remedy purposes, the tribunal held that if the respondent had acted fairly the claimant would inevitably have been dismissed, but with notice. It found that notice of termination would have been given two working days later than the claimant was actually dismissed. The tribunal also directed that any basic award for unfair dismissal should be reduced by 25% because the claimant engaged in blameworthy conduct on 24 February 2020, but not because of any blameworthy conduct leading to the final written warning.
The tribunal made no separate reduction for contributory conduct to any compensatory award. No monetary figures were set out in the judgment, and the written reasons note that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the respondent breached the claimant's contract of employment by failing to give notice of termination. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal unfair. It held that, had the respondent acted fairly, the claimant would inevitably have been dismissed but with notice, and that notice of termination would have been given two working days later than the actual dismissal. The tribunal reduced any basic award by 25% for blameworthy conduct on 24 February 2020, found no blameworthy conduct leading to the final written warning, and made no separate reduction for contributory conduct to any compensatory award. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.