Case 2413419/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Galbraith v LQ Group Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2413419/2019
- Decision date
- 29 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms G Galbraith
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningUnder Rule 21, Employment Judge Batten found that Ms G Galbraith was unfairly dismissed by LQ Group Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation). The judgment made the unfair dismissal finding and then addressed remedy by ordering a redundancy payment and a compensatory award.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a redundancy payment of £2,509.59. It also ordered a compensatory award of £500.00, described as compensation for loss of the claimant’s statutory employment rights. The bottom-line monetary award recorded in the judgment is therefore £3,009.59.
The accompanying interest notice states that unpaid sums would attract interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, with the stipulated rate noted as 8% from 30 May 2020, but the judgment itself does not record a separate quantified interest award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and ordered a compensatory award of £500.00 for loss of the claimant’s statutory employment rights. | Upheld | — | £500 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a redundancy payment in the sum of £2,509.59. | Upheld | — | £2,510 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,010
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.