Case 2413421/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Longshaw v Padimax Ltd (in voluntary creditors liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2413421/2019
- Decision date
- 16 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Longshaw
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBecause the respondent had not presented a response, Regional Employment Judge Parkin determined the case under Rule 21 on the information before the tribunal. The tribunal found the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages for four weeks’ statutory notice, calculated by reference to gross pay of £1,900 per month (£438.46 per week), in the sum of £1,753.84.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered £438.46 gross, being one week’s pay. It recorded that the claimant had already received payment of his outstanding wages and redundancy payment, so no further award was made on those items, and noted that the notice damages were assessed on a gross basis and may be treated by HMRC as Post-Employment Notice Pay. The hearing was not re-listed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,754 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £438 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment recorded that the claimant had already received payment of his outstanding wages. | Other | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment recorded that the claimant had already received payment of his redundancy payment. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,192
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,192
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.