Case 2413475/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Johnson v Townley House Nursery Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2413475/2020
- Decision date
- 2 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Whittaker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Johnson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss C Johnson worked for Townley House Nursery Limited as Baby Team Leader from 1 November 2019 and was promoted in December 2019 to Nursery Manager at Cuerden Nursery. Her contract contained a mobility clause. Cuerden Nursery closed on 20 March 2020 and she was furloughed. In early July 2020 the respondent told her to return to work on 6 July and said the nursery would reopen on 13 July, but on 6 July she was told that reopening on 13 July was no longer happening and no clear alternative date was given.
The tribunal found that between 3 and 10 July 2020 the claimant was left without guidance, was told when to take breaks, was refused an early finish on 9 July, and was not given a face-to-face meeting to explain the changing position. It held that this conduct breached the implied term of trust and confidence. The claimant resigned at the conclusion of the grievance meeting on 10 July 2020, and the tribunal found that she resigned in response to the breach and was therefore dismissed under s.136(1)(c) ERA 1996 and entitled to resign without notice.
The breach of contract claim for notice pay succeeded, and the tribunal awarded £593.84. At the earlier hearing the respondent had agreed that a preparation time order of £320 should be made. The redundancy payment claim was dismissed because the tribunal found there was no redundancy situation: there was still work for the claimant as manager, the mobility clause remained available, and the respondent's own evidence was that the nursery would open later. The tribunal also recorded that the claimant had not pursued an unfair dismissal claim, so no basic award or compensatory award was considered.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay was agreed at £593.84 at the earlier hearing. The tribunal held that the claimant resigned in response to a fundamental breach of the implied term of trust and confidence and was therefore dismissed under s.136(1)(c) ERA 1996 without having to work notice. | Upheld | — | £594 |
| Redundancy | Dismissed because the tribunal found there was no redundancy situation and no dismissal by reason of redundancy. It found there was still work for the claimant as manager, and the mobility clause in her contract remained available. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £914
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.135 ERA 1996
- s.136(1)(c) ERA 1996
- implied term of trust and confidence
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.