Case 2413540/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Friedman v Freedom Finance Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2413540/2020
- Decision date
- 27 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Peck
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Friedman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge Peck sitting alone by CVP on 7 January 2021. The tribunal dealt with two holiday-related wage claims brought by Mr S Friedman against Freedom Finance Limited.
The tribunal upheld the claim that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages. It found that the claimant had not been correctly paid in relation to 7 days' holiday taken during the period 1 April 2020 to 30 June 2020, and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £131.88.
The tribunal dismissed the separate claim for payment in respect of accrued but untaken holiday on termination of employment. No separate remedy was awarded for that claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages because the respondent failed to correctly pay the claimant in relation to 7 days' holiday taken during 1 April 2020 to 30 June 2020. | Upheld | — | £132 |
| Holiday pay | The claimant's claim for payment for accrued but untaken holiday on termination of employment was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £132
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.