Case 2413541/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Brown Mrs N Brown v The Bridge Cheshire Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2413541/2019
- Decision date
- 12 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tom Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Brown Mrs N Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that both claimants had well-founded claims for accrued but unpaid holiday pay. It awarded Mr O Brown 1.4 weeks' gross pay at £528.85 per week, producing an award of £740.39, and Mrs N Brown 1.4 weeks' gross pay at £480.76 per week, producing an award of £673.08.
The tribunal also found that Mrs N Brown had a well-founded claim for unauthorised deductions from wages. It accepted arrears of two weeks' gross pay of £961.54 and deducted £865.35 already paid, leaving £96.19 due on that claim.
The written judgment ordered the respondent to pay the awards on or before 24 December 2019. It recorded that the sums were calculated gross and may be taxable in the claimants' hands. The separate notice to the parties stated that if the sums remained unpaid after the relevant period, interest would accrue under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 at the stipulated rate of 8% from 13 December 2019.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Accrued but unpaid holiday pay for Mr O Brown; the tribunal awarded 1.4 weeks' gross pay at £528.85 per week. | Upheld | — | £740 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but unpaid holiday pay for Mrs N Brown; the tribunal awarded 1.4 weeks' gross pay at £480.76 per week. | Upheld | — | £673 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages for Mrs N Brown; the tribunal accepted arrears of £961.54, less £865.35 already paid. | Upheld | — | £96 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,510
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.