Case 2413558/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Shakeel Kayani and Mrs Shamila Shakeel v H. G. Care Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2413558/2019
- Decision date
- 26 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hoey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Shakeel Kayani and Mrs Shamila Shakeel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a private hearing in Manchester on 5 February 2020 before Employment Judge Hoey sitting alone, the tribunal recorded that the claimants were represented by Mr Aslam and that the respondent was not present or represented. The case concerned claims brought by Mr Shakeel Kayani and Mrs Shamila Shakeel against H. G. Care Services Limited under case numbers 2413558/2019 and 2413569/2019.
The tribunal dismissed the claimants' claims of sex discrimination, race discrimination and disability discrimination after the claimants withdrew those claims. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on liability for those claims beyond recording the withdrawal and consequent dismissal.
The remaining claims were not determined at that hearing and were listed to proceed to a hearing to be fixed. No monetary remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the sex discrimination claim was dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the race discrimination claim was dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the disability discrimination claim was dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.