Case 2413573/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P D Cooper v Your Housing Group Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2413573/2018
- Decision date
- 23 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspinall
- Venue
- Liverpool
- Panel members
- Mr A Murphy, Mr R Cunningham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P D Cooper
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Liverpool, sitting on 12 and 13 November 2020 before Employment Judge Aspinall with Mr A Murphy and Mr R Cunningham, gave a unanimous judgment on the claimant's discrimination claims against Your Housing Group Limited. The claimant's claim for direct age discrimination contrary to sections 13 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010 failed.
The tribunal also rejected the claimant's claim for direct disability discrimination contrary to sections 13 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010. No award of compensation or other remedy was recorded in the written decision.
The written record states that the reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in accordance with the note in the judgment. The published decision therefore records only the claim outcomes and not the underlying reasoning in written form.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Direct age discrimination claim under sections 13 and 39 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination claim under sections 13 and 39 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.