Case 2413604/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Davies v Prosurance Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2413604/2019
- Decision date
- 13 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tom Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Davies
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss D Davies brought a claim in respect of arrears or wages against Prosurance Ltd. The respondent did not enter a response or attend the hearing. The claimant produced her final payslip showing a net total of £866.59 and gave evidence that she had in fact been paid only £400, leaving £466.59 unpaid. The tribunal accepted that evidence and found the arrears claim well-founded.
The claimant also showed that she had complained about the non-payment. She produced text messages sent to Christopher Pike between 6 August 2019 and 3 September 2019, and to Lewis Camilleri, a director of the respondent, between 12 August 2019 and 3 September 2019. The tribunal held that those messages amounted to a grievance about the failure to pay and therefore engaged ACAS Code of Practice 1 on disciplinary and grievance procedures.
The tribunal found that the respondent made a complete and unreasonable failure to comply with the Code. It noted that Mr Pike acknowledged the debt, Mr Camilleri told the claimant to wait for Mr Pike while he was on annual leave and said, "I am very busy. Stop messaging me!", and the respondent then did nothing further about the complaint. On that basis, the tribunal applied s.207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and increased the award by the full 25% uplift.
The award was calculated as £466.59 arrears of wages plus a £116.65 s.207A uplift, making a total of £583.24. The judgment ordered payment on or before 3 January 2020. The attached interest notice recorded that interest would apply under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the award was not paid within 14 days after the decision was sent, but no separate interest sum was set out in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was described as arrears or wages. The tribunal found the claimant had been underpaid and awarded the unpaid sum plus a 25% uplift under s.207A TULR(C)A 1992. | Upheld | — | £583 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £583
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- ACAS Code of Practice 1 on disciplinary and grievance procedures
- s.207A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.