Case 2413616/2023 · Employment Tribunal
G Bonner v DAPA Coffee Formby Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2413616/2023
- Decision date
- 2 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
G Bonner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 20 December 2023. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge decided the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 without a full contested hearing.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claim. It adjudged that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £364.30.
The judgment was accompanied by an interest notice. That notice stated that interest would be payable on tribunal awards of money unless the sum was paid in full within 14 days after the written record was sent to the parties, and it recorded the relevant decision day as 2 April 2024, the calculation day as 3 April 2024, and the stipulated rate as 8% per annum. No separate interest amount was quantified in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £364.30. | Upheld | — | £364 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £364
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.