Case 2413632/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Vickers v Spring Healthcare Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2413632/2023
- Decision date
- 2 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R Vickers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Phil Allen dealt with the case on 28 August 2024 at Manchester by CVP. The respondent, Spring Healthcare Ltd, did not attend and had not submitted a response. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Ms R Vickers the outstanding sum of £1,362. The judgment also stated that the sum was to be paid within 14 days of the date the judgment was sent to the parties. The accompanying notice explained that interest would only become payable if the award remained unpaid after the relevant decision day, but no interest figure was assessed in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent did not attend and no response was submitted. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the outstanding sum. | Upheld | — | £1,362 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,362
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.