Case 2413634/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Michelle Cluff v G & L Jones trading as Go Local Extra Halewood Stores — 2024
- Case reference
- 2413634/2023
- Decision date
- 30 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rhodes Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Michelle Cluff
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss Michelle Cluff, brought complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages and unfair dismissal against G & L Jones trading as Go Local Extra Halewood Stores. At the start of the hearing she withdrew the wages complaint about unpaid holiday pay, and the tribunal dismissed that complaint upon withdrawal.
The unfair dismissal claim turned on whether the claimant was dismissed on 27 November 2023 or resigned. The tribunal heard evidence from the claimant, Linda Jones and Sarah Telford, and preferred Miss Jones's evidence overall. It found that the claimant attended the shop voluntarily to collect wages, after messages showing she was on her way, and rejected the claimant's account that she had been forced to attend because wages had been withheld.
The tribunal found that Miss Jones invited the claimant into the back room to address a dispute arising from a third-hand allegation about drugs. It accepted that Miss Jones denied making the allegation said to have been passed on by the claimant's sister, and found that when the claimant became angry Miss Jones said she would have to reassess the claimant's employment if the conduct continued. The claimant replied "fuck off - stick your job" and walked out.
Applying section 95(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996 and the surrounding circumstances, the tribunal found that Miss Jones did not dismiss the claimant. It held that any alleged words such as "it's done" were ambiguous, and that the claimant's immediate message asking if she had been sacked showed the position was not clear and unambiguous. The tribunal also relied on the absence of premeditation, the fact that Miss Jones did not send a termination letter, and the P45 showing 3 December 2023 as the termination date, and therefore dismissed the unfair dismissal claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant withdrew the complaint about unpaid holiday pay at the start of the hearing; the tribunal dismissed it upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant had not been dismissed and that her employment ended because she resigned or failed to return, so the claim was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.95(1)(a) ERA 1996
- objective determination of dismissal
- Futty v D and D Brekkes Ltd
- Goodwill Incorporated (Glasgow) Ltd v Ferrier
- Tom Cobleigh plc v Young
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.