Case 2413637/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Cohen v Atlas One Limited and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 2413637/2019
- Decision date
- 17 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr A Cohen
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ross, sitting at Manchester on 4 February 2020, found that there was a relevant transfer of an undertaking within the meaning of regulation 3 TUPE 2006 from Atlas One Limited to Eddisons Commercial Limited on or around 30 August 2019. The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would follow in due course.
The judgment also records that settlement had been agreed between the claimant and the second respondent in the sum of £14,000. The case was stayed until 3 March 2020, and if no application was made to the Tribunal by either party by that date the case would be dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant, with his consent to that course of action.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The tribunal found a relevant transfer of an undertaking within the meaning of regulation 3 TUPE 2006 from Atlas One Limited to Eddisons Commercial Limited on or around 30 August 2019. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,000
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- regulation 3 TUPE 2006
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.