Case 2413641/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L King v YMCA St Helens — 2024
- Case reference
- 2413641/2023
- Decision date
- 19 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L King
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss L King brought a claim against YMCA St Helens. The tribunal identified the case as one that should be struck out because the claimant did not have 2 years' qualifying service. By letter dated 12 February 2024, the tribunal invited the claimant to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Benson ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the dismissal claim or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant did not have 2 years' qualifying service. By a letter dated 12 February 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, but she failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.